Monday, January 7, 2013

Supreme Court says government can be liable for floods | Reduction

Supreme Court says government can be liable for floods

Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Franklin Delano Roosevelt by jimbowen0306
License (according to Flickr): Attribution License
Excerpt:

The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the federal government is not automatically exempt from paying for damage caused by temporary flooding from government-owned dams. The court sided with the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission in its appeal of a lower court ruling that said the federal government did not have to pay for damage to thousands of trees after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers released more water than usual from its dam on the Black River. The release of additional water benefitted farmers, but the commission said its hardwood forest suffered significant damage. The commission said the damage amounted to the government taking its property, for which compensation would be owed under the Constitution. The Court of Federal Claims agreed and ordered the government to pay $5. 6 million for destroyed and damaged trees. But the U.

People:

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Overall Sentiment: -0.268594

Relevance: 0.62472

SentimentQuote
-0.168744Ginsburg said that "government-induced flooding of limited duration, but severe impact, can amount to a taking of property warranting just compensation."
Sentiment Stats:
  • Number of Quotes: 1
  • Aggregate Sentiment: -0.168744
  • Mean: -0.168744
  • Standard Deviation: 1.4142135623731

Justice Elena Kagan

Overall Sentiment: 0.144433

Relevance: 0.327684

Disambiguation: Politician | Appointee | OfficeHolderReferences:

Key:

  • Aggregate Sentiment is meant to be an indicator of an individual's overall sentiment.
  • The Mean is meant to be an indicator of an individual's average comment sentiment.
  • The Standard Deviation, when there are enough quotes, will indicate an individual's consistency of sentiment (i.e. a Standard Deviation of 0 would mean they were very consistent in their sentiment and 1 would mean they were very inconsistent).

Note that quote stats are likely to be meaningless beyond the aggregate score due to the tiny sample size. However, they are always provided just in case you find something useful there.

Additional Info:

Organization: Supreme Court

Overall Sentiment: 0

Relevance: 0.896201

Organization: federal government

Overall Sentiment: -0.260123

Relevance: 0.869955

Organization: U.S Court of Appeals

Overall Sentiment: -0.258533

Relevance: 0.440024

Organization: commission

Overall Sentiment: -0.17063

Relevance: 0.391752

Header Details

No comments:

Post a Comment